|
It
is the grain of sand that irritates the oyster that makes a pearl.
Grains of sand are irritants in machines and engineers try to remove
them to ensure smooth running. Smooth running is routine. Routine does
not foster innovation or change, but inertia and, eventually, decay. No
grain, no gain!
In the UK we mourn the 'homogenization' of our high streets, but here
the retail is the area where the chains dominate - every high street
with the same shops. In Europe the balance in the hotel market between
the homogenized chain and the unique individual property has been
healthy with only 20% or less of hotels etc. being chain owned. The
small independents have proved to be places of style and innovation,
spawning the boutique movement, new approaches to design and operation
in dozens of bars and restaurants across the continent (as well as
serving up sometimes decrepit hotels with poor food and awful standards
- you get both extremes).
Now the story is changing. In France for the first time the chains
approach 30% of rooms as independent hotels and the famous zincs (pensions
and bar cafés) slide out of business, killed by concepts of employment
protection, the working time directive and punitive taxation levels. The
result is a growth in the number of French hotel rooms owned by
international brands as a proportion of the overall ownership of the
hotel industry.
Branding is becoming the prime marketing concern for the international
hotel industry. The US market is dominated by the brands with an
estimated 80% of rooms owned by major chains. The chains are eagerly
pushing into China to try to build up brand loyalty there, amongst a
third of the world’s population. It has resulted in some truly boring
and unadventurous hotel design, although there are exceptions to this as
there are to every generalization. In Europe the variety and competition
from the smaller hotelier has kept the chains on their toes in design
and operational terms.
Whilst tourism and occupancy rates have risen, the cost of development
has risen too, putting smaller players at a disadvantage. For the large
brands the issues are how to manage the branding across continents. As
travelers increasingly use the web to book (over 50% of some major
chains bookings are now generated over the web) they see branding as a
quality mark. There is no agreed international standard for judging
hotels, and the star system doesn’t work, as a five star in one country
will be equivalent to a lower rating elsewhere. Sometimes stars are
awarded without physical inspection, or the payment the rating authority
receives warps its judgment and the award of the rating is inappropriate
for the hotel visited. This just leaves the brand as the quality mark.
The management of the brand standard becomes a major issue for a
company, with not only differentiation between its own brands being at
stake, not only the perception of the brand by the guest, but also the
perception of stock holders and franchisees and thereby the value of the
company itself. Within a brand the management of innovation can be
problematic. The imposition of standards can lead to the stifling of any
variation from those standards in the interests of maintaining an
equality of experience for the guest – no variety or innovation means
homogenization. Everything will tend to drift to the lowest common
denominator.
The challenge for chain hotels is how to manage innovation. How does the
group stay at the front of design and innovation in the provision for
its guest as, briefly, Le Méridien group did? How does a hotel stay
ahead of domestic changes so that the ‘wow’ factor is still present in
its properties? It can be done, but skillful management and genuine
leadership are needed. What are a company’s policies on innovation and
design leadership? How does it plan to avoid perhaps not an actual
decline in standards, but a perceived one due to a failure to raise them
as the rest of the hotel world moves up market? Maybe worse, is it
becoming a boring brand?
If the trends to scale and international branding continue, spread, and
lead to the collapse of the independent hotel groups in Europe, it may
lead to the market dominance of the chains on this side of the Atlantic
as well as in the USA. Then we will all be losers.
www.Hoteldesigns.net
|